Overview of Avalon Q and Fluminer L1
Avalon Q is a 2026‑generation Bitcoin ASIC miner designed for the SHA‑256 algorithm. It targets users who want strong hashrate, good energy efficiency and the option to use eco, standard or performance modes. This makes it interesting both for small mining farms and for advanced home miners looking for a relatively quiet, efficient Bitcoin miner.
Fluminer L1 is a Scrypt ASIC miner optimized for Litecoin and Dogecoin mining. Thanks to merged mining, it can mine LTC and DOGE at the same time, which often improves overall revenue. It focuses on delivering high Scrypt hashrate with reasonable power draw and is positioned as a profitable choice for Scrypt mining in 2026.
In this article we compare the profitability of Avalon Q vs Fluminer L1 at an electricity price of 0.10 USD per kWh, using typical 2026 specs and realistic income estimates.
Key specs: hashrate, power and efficiency
First, compare the core technical parameters of each miner: algorithm, hashrate, power and efficiency. These values drive both electricity costs and potential income.
| Miner | Algorithm | Hashrate | Power consumption | Energy efficiency |
| Avalon Q | SHA‑256 (Bitcoin) | 90 TH/s | ≈ 1674 W | ≈ 18.6 J/TH |
| Fluminer L1 | Scrypt (LTC + DOGE) | 5.6 GH/s | ≈ 1300 W | ≈ 0.23 J/MH |
Avalon Q runs at around 1.674 kW, while Fluminer L1 draws about 1.3 kW. Both are relatively efficient for their algorithms, but the coins they mine and the revenue models are completely different: pure Bitcoin vs Scrypt with merged mining.
Profitability at $0.10/kWh: daily, monthly, yearly
To compare **Avalon Q profitability** and **Fluminer L1 profitability** at 0.10 USD/kWh, we break things into two parts: electricity cost and approximate revenue before power.
Electricity cost at $0.10/kWh
Daily energy use:
- Avalon Q: 1.674 kW × 24 h ≈ 40.2 kWh per day.
- Fluminer L1: 1.3 kW × 24 h = 31.2 kWh per day.
Daily electricity cost:
- Avalon Q: 40.2 × 0.10 ≈ 4.02 USD per day.
- Fluminer L1: 31.2 × 0.10 = 3.12 USD per day.
Monthly and yearly power cost:
| Metric | Avalon Q | Fluminer L1 |
| Daily power cost | ≈ $4.02 | ≈ $3.12 |
| Monthly power cost (30 days) | ≈ $120.60 | ≈ $93.60 |
| Yearly power cost (365 days) | ≈ $1467.30 | ≈ $1138.80 |
Approximate gross income (“before power”)
Under typical 2026 conditions:
- Avalon Q earns roughly 3.6 USD per day before electricity.
- Fluminer L1 earns roughly 4.2 USD per day before electricity (LTC + DOGE merged mining).
These are average figures and will move with coin prices, difficulty and pool luck, but they are suitable for a comparative example.
Net profit comparison at $0.10/kWh
Now we subtract electricity cost from gross income.
| Metric | Avalon Q | Fluminer L1 |
| Daily gross income | ≈ $3.60 | ≈ $4.20 |
| Daily power cost | ≈ $4.02 | ≈ $3.12 |
| Daily net profit | ≈ −$0.42 | ≈ $1.08 |
| Monthly net profit (30 days) | ≈ −$12.60 | ≈ $32.40 |
| Yearly net profit (365 days) | ≈ −$153.30 | ≈ $394.20 |
At an electricity rate of 0.10 USD/kWh:
– Avalon Q is close to break‑even but slightly negative on average.
– Fluminer L1 stays modestly profitable, bringing in about 1 USD per day net, or roughly 30–35 USD per month.
Real‑world results can be higher or lower, but the relative difference between these two miners at this power price is clear.
ROI and when each miner makes sense
Return on investment (ROI) depends on the device price and the net profit it generates.
Assume typical 2026 hardware prices:
- Avalon Q price: about 1500–1700 USD.
- Fluminer L1 price: about 1600–1800 USD.
With the net results above:
– Avalon Q at −12.60 USD per month has negative cash flow at 0.10 USD/kWh. With these inputs there is no real ROI unless Bitcoin price rises or your electricity price drops.
– Fluminer L1 at roughly 32 USD per month net yields a very long simple payback period:
- For a 1700 USD Fluminer L1: 1700 ÷ 32 ≈ 53 months (over 4 years).
In other words, at this electricity price neither machine is an “instant money printer,” but Fluminer L1 at least generates positive cash flow, while Avalon Q effectively mines at a slight loss at current conditions.
If your electricity price is lower, for example 0.05–0.07 USD/kWh, the picture changes:
– Avalon Q can become profitable because its energy efficiency starts to matter more than the absolute tariff.
– Fluminer L1 also becomes more profitable, and its ROI shortens accordingly.
Which miner is better for you?
At an electricity cost of 0.10 USD/kWh, the comparison is straightforward:
– **Avalon Q**:
– Strong SHA‑256 hashrate and efficient Bitcoin mining hardware.
– At 0.10 USD/kWh it is roughly break‑even or slightly unprofitable in typical 2026 conditions.
– Best suited for miners with cheaper electricity or a long‑term BTC accumulation strategy who accept short‑term fiat losses.
– **Fluminer L1**:
– High Scrypt hashrate and the advantage of merged mining Litecoin and Dogecoin.
– Remains modestly profitable at 0.10 USD/kWh, with around 1 USD/day net income.
– Fits miners who want positive fiat cash flow even at a relatively high power price and are comfortable holding LTC/DOGE.
If your power price is fixed at 0.10 USD/kWh and you must choose between these two devices, Fluminer L1 is generally the better option for short‑ and medium‑term profitability. Avalon Q becomes attractive only if you can significantly reduce your effective electricity cost or if your strategy is to stack Bitcoin regardless of current fiat ROI.
For any purchase, always update these calculations with current market data, your exact electricity tariff, pool fees and your own goals—whether you prioritize fast payback, long‑term holding of a specific coin, or a mix of both.
